RCR 14 : Science and Religion

	Duration: 09:36 minutes Upload Time: 2007-10-02 01:10:19 User: DanielLevesque :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: Who says science and religion have to be mutually exclusive?
Comments
memoryofakiss ::: Favorites cite source... 07-10-10 06:45:08 __________________________________________________
DanielLevesque ::: Favorites You shouldn't, the drug resistant bacteria have been shown to revert to their former state soon after the drug is removed fromthe environment. 07-10-10 05:08:43 __________________________________________________
DanielLevesque ::: Favorites Word games and nothing more. I use common vernacular with the same meaning as technical jargon. You of course, lack the intelligence to understand this. 07-10-09 15:45:42 __________________________________________________
DanielLevesque ::: Favorites I never said good either. I said perfect. 07-10-09 15:44:20 __________________________________________________
Desertphile ::: Favorites "evolution is simply a theory" No, Dunning-Kruger, evoilution is *NOT* a theory: evolutionary theory is. 07-10-09 14:01:00 __________________________________________________
memoryofakiss ::: Favorites so you wouldnt consider the bacteria that has mutated and gained the ability to digest nylon to be a benefit to the bacteria? seems beneficial to me ... no competition for food, not fatal... hmm whats the negative? or are you just going to pretend it didnt happen not even going to touch drug resistant bacteria and how much the resistance to drugs benefits them. 07-10-09 06:30:57 __________________________________________________
memoryofakiss ::: Favorites i dont need jesus and im far from perfect. sure jesus is good for a laugh at times but other than that he is hardly essential to living a good life. 07-10-09 06:28:36 __________________________________________________
memoryofakiss ::: Favorites In addition... even if most mutations WERE negative and fatal... dead creatures do not mate. on the off chance a creature with a negative mutation did mate the later generations would also be less likely to successfully mate. if you wish to disprove this please show me evidence of dead animals mating without the aid of science. welcome to a basic understanding of natural selection 07-10-09 06:27:30 __________________________________________________
memoryofakiss ::: Favorites WRONG WRONG WRONG sickle cell anemia... sure you can shout negative ... but only if you dont know all the details if you were in an area where malaria ran rampant you would benefit from sickle cell. 07-10-09 06:24:51 __________________________________________________
DanielLevesque ::: Favorites Big difference, GUns are a physical object, evolution is simply a theory that is ephemeral as human idea with no physical substance, which is why we have to look for evidence that it may exist. I found teh evidence lacking. 07-10-09 04:19:11 __________________________________________________